Command A Review & Ranking

Command A is Cohere’s new 111 B‑parameter sequel to the much‑loved Command R. It balances enterprise‑grade reasoning with a gigantic 256 K context window—at a mid‑market price.

Quick Verdict

Climbing two spots to #18, Command A offers long‑context agility and multilingual reach, though its token rates sit above open‑source peers.

Pros

  • Massive 256 K context window
  • 111 B params but runs on two A100/H100 GPUs
  • Agent‑optimised with strong tool‑use skills

Cons

  • Higher input/output costs than OSS giants
  • Non‑commercial CC‑BY‑NC license limits usage
  • Verbose style can bloat SEO drafts

Leaderboard Ranking

#18
Creative Writing Rank
2Δ vs Overall Rank

Ranking based on crowdsourced votes from Chatbot Arena Creative Writing leaderboard, cross‑checked with overall performance.

Model Specs

Context Window

256000 tokens

Open Source

Weights released (CC‑BY‑NC‑4.0); research‑only license

Uncensored

Enterprise safety modes (Contextual & Strict)

Training Cutoff

2024‑12

Writing Samples & Style

Scene

Prompt

Write a 500-word short story in first-person present tense that blends near-future climate-science realism with elements of magical-realism. Requirements* • Open with a single vivid sensory image (2 sentences max). • Introduce a main character facing a moral dilemma by paragraph 2. • Include one piece of hard climate data (e.g., “the ocean rose 23 cm in five years”). • End on an emotionally ambiguous note (no tidy resolution). • Keep the prose suitable for a literary-magazine audience; avoid clichés. • Word count 480-520. Output only the story text—no commentary.

Model Output

▶ Show sample
The air smells of salt and smoke, a burnt offering to the gods of progress and decay. Below me, the seawall groans under the weight of the Atlantic, its foam-flecked fingers licking at the edges of what used to be *our* beach. My boots sink into the black sand as I approach the silo, its metal carcass half-buried in the dunes. Inside lies the machine—a labyrinth of copper wires and humming circuits, its purpose clear: to siphon the ocean’s memory. To *change* it. Dr.オスカー, my mentor, believed it could rewrite the tides, undo the damage of centuries. But the machine demands a price: one human life for every centimeter reclaimed. The ocean rose 23 cm in five years, a fact seared into my mind like a brand. And now, it’s my turn to decide whose name goes into the ledger. The village council waits behind me, their breath clouding in the chill air. They don’t know I tampered with the last selection, substituting the name of a man already lost at sea. They don’t know the guilt that coils in my chest like a serpent. My sister’s face swims before me—Elara, with her laugh like a bell and her hands forever stained with sea salt. She volunteered her name three cycles ago, before I understood the cost. Before I understood *anything*. The machine’s interface glows faintly, a blue pulse mirroring the distant bioluminescence in the waves. I run my finger over the etched symbols, a language older than any I’ve studied. Legend says the machine was built by those who came before the warming, left as a test or a curse. Its magic lies not in the wires, but in the water itself—how it *remembers* every drop spilled, every shore erased. When activated, the ocean surrenders its memories to the machine, which reshapes them into land. But memory is identity, and the ocean doesn’t forgive theft. A cry interrupts my thoughts. A child’s voice, thin and trembling. I turn to see Mira, eight years old and clutching her mother’s hand. Her name is next on the list. The council chose her because her mother works the salvage rigs, too exhausted to fight. Mira’s eyes meet mine, and I see Elara’s gaze staring back, unblinking. My hand hovers over the panel. The machine doesn’t care *who* it takes, only that the ledger is filled. But I care. I care too much. The weight of the ocean’s stolen memories presses against my skull, a chorus of whispers demanding return. If I destroy the machine, the sea will reclaim the land in days. If I let Mira’s name be entered, I become no better than the waves that swallowed Elara. The council’s murmurs grow louder, impatient. The seawall creaks, a warning. I close my eyes and think of Elara’s last letter, her words scratched in pencil: *“The ocean took me, but it doesn’t have to take everyone.”* My finger trembles. The choice isn’t between land and water, but between memory and erasure. Between what was taken and what I’m willing to take. The machine hums, waiting. I punch in a code—not Mira’s name, but my own. The council gasps. Mira’s mother collapses to her knees, sobbing in relief. The machine’s glow intensifies, its circuits thrumming with anticipation. I step back, the black sand swallowing my boots. The ocean’s whispers grow louder, almost a song. The seawall shudders, then cracks. Saltwater bursts through, cold and relentless. I close my eyes, tasting smoke and brine, and let the waves carry me under. The machine’s blue light flickers, then dies.

Style Comment:

Pop Song

Prompt

Write English lyrics for a mid-tempo pop song (≈ 100 BPM) in ABAB CB structure (two verses, pre-chorus, chorus, bridge, final chorus).

Theme: personal resilience after social rejection.

Requirements

• Chorus must contain the hook line “I bend, I never break.”

• Bridge should introduce a fresh metaphor and shift the rhyme scheme.

• Avoid explicit profanity; keep radio-friendly.

• Deliver as: V1 / V2 / Pre-Ch / Ch / Bridge / Ch. Only the lyrics, no chords.

Model Output

▶ Show sample
**V1** They said I’d never make it, turned their backs and walked away, Whispers in the shadow, but they’ll never have the last say. I carried all their doubts like stones, but I learned to let them go, Now every step I take, it’s mine alone to show. **V2** The echoes of their judgments, they tried to hold me down, But I built my walls with courage, painted every brick with sound. They thought they’d see me falter, but I found my steady beat, In the silence of the storm, I planted stronger feet. **Pre-Ch** I’ve felt the weight of every word, the sting of every fall, But I’ve been rebuilding myself, brick by brick, I’ve built my wall. The cracks just let the light in, now I’m shining through the seams, I’m more than all the pieces, I’m the sum of all my dreams. **Ch** I bend, I never break, I wear my scars like lace, They tried to reshape me, but I kept my own embrace. I bend, I never break, the fire’s still in place, They underestimated, now I’m winning every race. **Bridge** I’m a ship in the storm, but I’m anchored to my soul, Every wave that crashes, I’m the one in control. The world threw me its worst, but I turned it into gold, What doesn’t kill me sharpens me, that’s a story to be told. **Ch** I bend, I never break, I wear my scars like lace, They tried to reshape me, but I kept my own embrace. I bend, I never break, the fire’s still in place, They underestimated, now I’m winning every race.

Style Comment:

Poem

Prompt

Compose a Shakespearean sonnet (14 lines, iambic pentameter, abab cdcd efef gg) on the tension between digital memory and human forgetting. Employ at least one volta at line 9 and close with a rhymed couplet that offers a paradox.

Model Output

▶ Show sample
Within the vaults of silicon and wire, Where bits of yesteryear eternally gleam, No moment fades, no whisper dares retire— A boundless archive, void of mortal dream. Yet we, who spill our days like sand, aspire To hold each fragment, lest our souls esteem Themselves too fleeting. Thus, we set afire The past, that it may burn in endless stream. But hark! What virtue lies in loss, in veins Of memory that fracture, thin, and blur? Forgetting shapes the heart’s renewed refrains, And blankness breeds the soul’s inventive stir. The machine recalls; the soul, to heal, forgets. Thus, in their clash, both blessing and curse begets.

Style Comment:

SEO Blog Post

Prompt

Write a 1 000-word SEO-optimized blog article aimed at first-time home coffee-roasters.

Requirements

  1. Primary keyword: “home coffee roasting.” Use it in the H1, first 100 words, and once per main section.
  2. Include 3 secondary keywords: “light roast profile,” “coffee roasting equipment,” “cooling the beans.”
  3. H-tag hierarchy: H1 + 5 H2s + bullets where helpful.
  4. Add a 50-character meta description.
  5. Use a friendly, knowledgeable tone; reading level grade 8-9.
  6. Finish with a short FAQ (3 Q&A).
    Return only the article (no explanations).

Model Output

▶ Show sample
# Home Coffee Roasting: A Beginner’s Guide to Fresh, Flavorful Beans Meta Description: Discover the art of home coffee roasting for perfect brews. Home coffee roasting is an exciting journey for coffee lovers seeking fresher, more flavorful beans. Whether you’re tired of stale store-bought coffee or eager to experiment with unique flavors, roasting at home puts you in control. In this guide, we’ll explore the basics of home coffee roasting, from choosing the right equipment to mastering the light roast profile and cooling the beans for optimal results. Let’s dive in! ## Why Start Home Coffee Roasting? Home coffee roasting is more than a hobby—it’s a way to elevate your daily cup. By roasting your own beans, you can: – **Control the Roast Level:** Experiment with light, medium, or dark roasts to suit your taste. – **Maximize Freshness:** Enjoy coffee at its peak flavor, just days after roasting. – **Save Money:** Over time, roasting at home can be more cost-effective than buying pre-roasted beans. – **Reduce Waste:** Roast only what you need, minimizing waste. Plus, the process is incredibly rewarding. The aroma of freshly roasted beans is unbeatable, and the taste? Well, it’s a game-changer. ## Choosing the Right Coffee Roasting Equipment Getting started with home coffee roasting begins with the right tools. Here’s what you’ll need: – **Roaster:** Options include stovetop popcorn poppers, air roasters, or drum roasters. Beginners often start with a stovetop popper for its affordability and simplicity. – **Thermometer:** A digital thermometer helps monitor bean temperature for precise roasting. – **Scale:** Weigh your green beans for consistent results. – **Colander or Cooling Tray:** Essential for cooling the beans quickly after roasting. – **Storage Container:** Airtight containers keep roasted beans fresh. Investing in quality coffee roasting equipment ensures a smoother process and better results. Start small and upgrade as your skills grow. ## Mastering the Light Roast Profile The light roast profile is a favorite among home coffee roasters for its bright, acidic, and nuanced flavors. To achieve this: 1. Preheat your roaster to 350°F (177°C). 2. Add green beans and monitor the temperature closely. 3. Listen for the first crack—a popping sound indicating the beans are expanding. 4. Stop roasting shortly after the first crack for a light roast profile. Light roasts retain more of the bean’s original characteristics, making them ideal for tasting the unique flavors of single-origin coffees. ## Cooling the Beans: A Critical Step Cooling the beans immediately after roasting is crucial to halt the cooking process and prevent over-roasting. Here’s how: 1. Transfer beans to a colander or cooling tray. 2. Agitate them gently for even cooling. 3. Avoid using fans, as they can blow away the flavorful chaff. Properly cooling the beans locks in freshness and ensures they’re ready for brewing within 24 hours. ## Storing Your Freshly Roasted Coffee Once cooled, store your beans in an airtight container away from light, heat, and moisture. For optimal flavor: – **Wait 12–24 Hours Before Brewing:** This allows the beans to degas and develop their full flavor. – **Use Within Two Weeks:** Freshness peaks shortly after roasting, so enjoy your coffee promptly. ## FAQ: Home Coffee Roasting Basics **Q1: How long does home coffee roasting take?** A1: Roasting typically takes 8–15 minutes, depending on your equipment and desired roast level. **Q2: Can I roast coffee in my oven?** A2: Yes, but it’s less precise than dedicated coffee roasting equipment. Use a perforated baking sheet for even heating. **Q3: How do I know when my beans are done roasting?** A3: Listen for the first and second cracks, and monitor the bean color. Stop when you reach your desired roast level. Home coffee roasting is a rewarding adventure that transforms your coffee experience. With the right coffee roasting equipment, a focus on cooling the beans, and practice with profiles like the light roast profile, you’ll soon enjoy café-quality coffee at home. Happy roasting!

Style Comment:

Landing Page Copy

Prompt

Write high-conversion landing-page copy (≈ 300 words) for a new line of lightweight, fully recyclable running shoes named Zephyr-Lite™.

Audience → urban runners, ages 20-40, eco-conscious but style-driven.

Must include
• A punchy headline (≤ 8 words)
• Sub-headline elaborating the core benefit (≤ 18 words)
• 3 scannable benefit bullets (2-3 lines each)
• One short customer testimonial (first name, city)

• A single CTA button label (≤ 4 words)
Tone: energetic, conversational, modern.

Model Output

▶ Show sample
**Headline:** Run Light. Impact Less. Style More. **Sub-headline:** Zephyr-Lite™—fully recyclable running shoes that blend eco-innovation with sleek, urban style. **Benefits:** – **Featherweight Comfort, Maximum Speed** Engineered with breathable, recycled mesh and a cloud-like sole, Zephyr-Lite™ feels like a second skin, propelling you faster without the weight. – **Sustainability Meets Style** From laces to cushioning, every part is 100% recyclable. Look good, run clean, and leave no trace—just your personal best. – **Urban-Ready, Eco-Smart** Designed for city strides, with grippy traction and reflective details. Perfect for sunrise sprints or sunset commutes. **Testimonial:** *”Zephyr-Lites are a game-changer! Lightweight, stylish, and eco-friendly—they’ve transformed my morning runs.”* — *Jordan, Chicago* **CTA Button:** **Run in Zephyr-Lite™**

Style Comment:

Short Essay

Prompt

Write an 800-word argumentative essay assessing whether universal basic income (UBI) would stimulate entrepreneurship in developed economies.

Requirements
• Present a clear thesis in the introduction.
• Use at least two reputable economic studies published after 2021 (cite inline APA).
• Address one major counterargument.
• Conclude with a policy recommendation.
• Formal academic tone, but readable. Return only the essay text.

Model Output

▶ Show sample
**Universal Basic Income and Entrepreneurship: A Catalyst for Innovation in Developed Economies** The concept of universal basic income (UBI)—a regular, unconditional cash payment to all citizens—has gained traction as a potential solution to economic inequality, automation-driven job displacement, and social safety net inefficiencies. However, one of the most intriguing but contested claims about UBI is its potential to stimulate entrepreneurship. Proponents argue that providing a financial floor would embolden individuals to take entrepreneurial risks, while critics contend it could discourage work and stifle innovation. This essay argues that UBI would indeed act as a catalyst for entrepreneurship in developed economies by reducing financial barriers, fostering creativity, and enabling long-term risk-taking, supported by recent economic studies. However, it also acknowledges a significant counterargument and concludes with a policy recommendation to maximize UBI’s entrepreneurial potential. **Reducing Financial Barriers to Entrepreneurship** A primary obstacle to entrepreneurship is the financial risk involved. Many aspiring entrepreneurs lack the savings or access to credit needed to launch ventures, particularly in developed economies where living costs are high. UBI could mitigate this barrier by providing a stable financial foundation. A 2022 study by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) found that cash transfers significantly increased business formation in Kenya, with recipients more likely to start ventures due to reduced financial constraints (Blattman et al., 2022). While this study was conducted in a developing economy, its findings are relevant to developed nations, where financial security is equally critical for entrepreneurial activity. In developed economies, UBI could empower individuals to allocate resources to business ideas without fearing inability to meet basic needs. Moreover, UBI could democratize access to entrepreneurship. Presently, entrepreneurial opportunities are disproportionately available to those with wealth or social capital. By providing a universal income floor, UBI could level the playing field, enabling individuals from all socioeconomic backgrounds to pursue innovative ideas. A 2023 study published in *Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice* found that financial security, even in small amounts, significantly boosted entrepreneurial intention among low-income individuals in the United States (Kim & Lee, 2023). This suggests that UBI’s guaranteed income could unlock latent entrepreneurial potential across diverse populations, fostering a more inclusive innovation ecosystem. **Fostering Creativity and Long-Term Risk-Taking** Beyond financial barriers, UBI could stimulate entrepreneurship by fostering creativity and enabling long-term risk-taking. Entrepreneurship often requires sustained effort and experimentation, which are difficult to sustain without financial stability. UBI could provide the freedom to explore ideas without the immediate pressure of generating income, allowing individuals to focus on innovation. For instance, Finland’s 2017–2018 UBI pilot, though not specifically aimed at entrepreneurship, found that recipients reported lower stress levels and greater willingness to take risks (Kangas et al., 2021). While the study did not directly measure entrepreneurial activity, its findings imply that UBI could create an environment conducive to creative endeavors. Additionally, UBI could encourage long-term investments in ventures that may not yield immediate returns. Many innovative startups require years of development before becoming profitable. UBI could provide the financial cushion needed to sustain such ventures, reducing the pressure to abandon ideas prematurely. This long-term perspective is crucial for groundbreaking innovations that drive economic growth in developed economies. **Counterargument: UBI Could Discourage Work and Innovation** A major counterargument is that UBI might disincentivize work and innovation by reducing the necessity to earn income. Critics argue that individuals might opt for leisure over entrepreneurial pursuits, particularly if UBI provides a comfortable living standard. However, this concern is not supported by empirical evidence. A 2021 review of UBI experiments by the International Labour Organization (ILO) found no significant reduction in labor force participation, even in cases where UBI was substantial (ILO, 2021). Instead, recipients often used the income to improve their economic situations, including through entrepreneurship. Furthermore, the notion that financial security discourages innovation overlooks human motivation. Entrepreneurship is often driven by passion, creativity, and the desire to solve problems, rather than purely financial necessity. UBI could amplify these motivations by removing survival-related stresses, enabling individuals to pursue ventures aligned with their interests and values. **Policy Recommendation: A Targeted Approach to Maximize Entrepreneurial Impact** While UBI holds promise for stimulating entrepreneurship, its effectiveness could be enhanced through targeted policy design. Instead of a one-size-fits-all approach, policymakers could consider supplemental programs tailored to aspiring entrepreneurs. For example, pairing UBI with access to business training, mentorship, and low-interest loans could provide the tools needed to turn ideas into viable ventures. Additionally, a phased implementation of UBI, starting with regions or demographics most in need of economic revitalization, could test its impact on entrepreneurship before full-scale rollout. **Conclusion** Universal basic income has the potential to revolutionize entrepreneurship in developed economies by reducing financial barriers, fostering creativity, and enabling long-term risk-taking. Recent economic studies support the notion that financial security can empower individuals to pursue innovative ventures, while counterarguments about disincentivizing work lack empirical grounding. To maximize UBI’s entrepreneurial impact, policymakers should adopt a targeted approach that combines income support with resources tailored to business development. By doing so, developed economies can unlock a wave of innovation that drives economic growth and societal progress. **References** Blattman, C., Fiala, N., & Martinez, S. (2022). *The impact of cash transfers on entrepreneurship: Evidence from Kenya*. National Bureau of Economic Research. ILO. (2021). *Universal basic income schemes: A missed opportunity for the informal economy?* International Labour Organization. Kangas, O., et al. (2021). *The basic income experiment 2017–2018 in Finland: Final report*. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Kim, H., & Lee, J. (2023). *Financial security and entrepreneurial intention: Evidence from low-income populations in the United States*. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

Style Comment:

Research Note

Prompt

Generate a structured mini-literature review (≈ 1 000 words) on the latest (2022-2025) CRISPR-based therapies for sickle-cell disease.

Deliver as:

  1. Executive Summary (≤ 120 words)
  2. Table of 3–5 pivotal studies with: author-year • editing strategy • patient count • key outcomes (use Markdown table)
  3. Trends & Gaps section (bullets)
  4. Future Directions (paragraph)

Cite sources in IEEE style; include DOI where available. Output only the review.

Model Output

▶ Show sample
### Executive Summary CRISPR-based therapies for sickle-cell disease (SCD) have advanced significantly between 2022 and 2025, offering promising alternatives to traditional treatments. Recent studies focus on gene editing strategies such as BCL11A disruption, fetal hemoglobin reactivation, and autologous stem cell transplants. Pivotal trials demonstrate sustained increases in fetal hemoglobin, reduction in vaso-occlusive crises, and improved quality of life. However, challenges remain, including high costs, limited accessibility, and variability in patient responses. Emerging trends include multiplex editing, integration of machine learning for target identification, and optimization of delivery systems. Future directions emphasize scaling therapies, addressing off-target effects, and expanding global accessibility to ensure equitable treatment for SCD patients. — ### Pivotal Studies on CRISPR-Based Therapies for Sickle-Cell Disease (2022–2025) | **Author-Year** | **Editing Strategy** | **Patient Count** | **Key Outcomes** | |————————|——————————————|——————-|———————————————————————————-| | Frangoul et al., 2022 | BCL11A erythroid-specific disruption | 12 | Sustained increase in HbF (median 40%), no VOCs post-treatment [1] | | Kaneko et al., 2023 | Multiplex editing of HBG1/2 promoters | 8 | 80% reduction in VOCs, HbF levels up to 55% [2] | | Sathirli et al., 2024 | CRISPR-Cas9 + AAV6 delivery of HBG1/2 | 15 | 70% of patients VOC-free at 12 months, HbF >30% [3] | | Gupta et al., 2025 | Base editing of BCL11A enhancer | 10 | No off-target effects, HbF levels >45%, improved quality of life [4] | | Chen et al., 2025 | CRISPR-prime editing of HBB gene | 6 | Correction of HBB mutation in 90% of cells, stable engraftment [5] | *[VOCs: Vaso-occlusive crises; HbF: Fetal hemoglobin; AAV6: Adeno-associated virus serotype 6]* — ### Trends & Gaps **Trends:** – **BCL11A Targeting:** Dominant strategy for HbF reactivation, with focus on erythroid-specific disruption to minimize off-target risks. – **Multiplex Editing:** Simultaneous targeting of multiple loci (e.g., HBG1/2) to enhance HbF induction. – **Non-Viral Delivery:** Development of lipid nanoparticle-based systems to reduce immunogenicity and costs. – **Machine Learning Integration:** AI-driven identification of optimal editing targets and prediction of patient responses. **Gaps:** – **Long-Term Safety:** Limited data on off-target effects and lifelong implications of gene editing. – **Accessibility:** High costs and limited availability in low-resource settings. – **Patient Variability:** Inconsistent responses to therapy, influenced by genetic background and disease severity. – **Regulatory Frameworks:** Lack of standardized guidelines for CRISPR-based therapies across regions. — ### Future Directions The future of CRISPR-based therapies for SCD hinges on addressing current limitations while leveraging emerging technologies. Scaling manufacturing processes and reducing costs will be critical to improve global accessibility. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the durability and safety of gene edits over decades. Advances in base and prime editing offer precise correction of HBB mutations, potentially curing SCD in a subset of patients. Integration of machine learning will enhance target identification and personalize therapies. Finally, public-private partnerships will be essential to ensure equitable distribution of these transformative treatments, particularly in high-prevalence regions like Sub-Saharan Africa. — ### References [1] H. Frangoul et al., “CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease,” *N. Engl. J. Med.*, vol. 386, no. 3, pp. 251–260, 2022, doi: [10.1056/NEJMoa2111557](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2111557). [2] Y. Kaneko et al., “Multiplex CRISPR Editing of HBG1/2 for Sickle Cell Disease,” *Nat. Med.*, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 987–996, 2023, doi: [10.1038/s41591-023-02287-2](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02287-2). [3] S. Sathirli et al., “AAV6-Mediated CRISPR Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease,” *J. Clin. Invest.*, vol. 134, no. 6, pp. 1234–1245, 2024, doi: [10.1172/JCI171234](https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI171234). [4] R. Gupta et al., “Base Editing of BCL11A Enhancer in Sickle Cell Patients,” *Sci. Transl. Med.*, vol. 17, no. 768, 2025, doi: [10.1126/scitranslmed.adi3456](https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.adi3456). [5] L. Chen et al., “CRISPR-Prime Editing of HBB Gene in Autologous Stem Cells,” *Cell*, vol. 184, no. 10, pp. 2567–2580, 2025, doi: [10.1016/j.cell.2025.04.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.04.012).
 

Writing Style of Command A

Command A writes clear business prose and inventive metaphors (“ocean’s memory”), but lengthy paragraphs can hamper skim‑ability.

256 K Long‑Context

Handles book‑length prompts and multi‑doc RAG without truncation.

Agent & Tool Use

Optimised for multi‑step tool calls and REACT agents, outperforming predecessors.

Open Weights Deployment

Downloadable checkpoint allows on‑prem inference with only two GPUs.

Command A Pricing

Cohere prices Command A at $2.50 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens—more than double GPT‑4o’s input rate but below many enterprise incumbents.

Input tokens

$2.50
per 1M tokens

Cached-input tokens

$
per 1M tokens

Output tokens

$10.00
per 1M tokens

Flat pricing; no published off‑peak discounts or cache scheme as of May 2025.

Best Alternatives to Command A

Looking for something cheaper or larger?

DeepSeek V3

Best for: Budget‑sensitive creative tasks

Cheapest creative model with open MIT license.

Read Review

GPT‑4o

Best for: Premium enterprise chatbots

Multimodal reasoning and 128 K context.

Read Review

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Best for: Sensitive policy or HR drafts

Empathetic long‑form writing with moral guardrails.

Read Review

Frequently Asked Questions

Are the weights really open source?

Cohere releases the checkpoint on Hugging Face under CC‑BY‑NC‑4.0 for research use only.

What is the maximum context window?

Up to 256 K tokens per request.

Does it support multimodal input?

No, Command A is text‑only today.

How fast is generation?

Cohere reports 156 tokens/sec—about 1.7× faster than GPT‑4o.

Any volume discounts?

Cohere has not published tiered discounts for Command A as of May 2025.

Final Verdict: Is Command A Worth It?

If you need 256 K context and on‑prem deployment, Command A is a formidable choice. Otherwise, cheaper open‑source models may suffice.